Legal speech and religious speech inevitably do some of the same work. Both are vehicles through which we both talk about and become the kind of people we are. Granted, those of us who teach and argue about the law do not often conceive of our work in this way. That is part of what I hope to begin to remedy in this essay. While the construction of character is a more obvious aspect of religious than legal thought, law, including legal argument, can be constitutive in similar ways. If so—if our ways of talking about the law serve some of the same ends as do our ways of talking about religion—then we may be able to learn how better to talk about the law by thinking about how we talk about religion. I do not mean things like paragraph structure or argument organization or the proper use of headings, but rather something more subtle and more fundamental. One way to put it is this: legal speech can learn from religious speech how to be less small, and perhaps more ennobling.
This paper considers how James Hunter’s arguments, presented both in his address and his book To Change...Read more
Article by: Jeffrey Standen, 41 PEPP. L. REV. 349 (2014)Read more
Government Tan Lines: Examining the Reach and Effectiveness of Federal and State Efforts to Protect Consumers from the Dangers of Indoor Tanning
Gone are the days when fair skin was considered a sign of beauty and wealth.’ Instead, these...Read more
This paper deals with a discussion of the comparative treatment of the recovery of pure economic loss...Read more
Article by: Seema Mohapatra 43 PEPP. L. REV. 1017 (2016) Imagine applying for a job, and as...Read more